Thursday, October 05, 2006

The Departed movie review


The Departed----****

It’s a pleasure to report that "The Departed," the gritty crime-gangster drama, is Martin Scorsese’s best film since the 1990 “The GoodFellas,“ to which the new film bears loose resemblance in thematic rather than stylistic terms.

After two quasi-epics, “Gangs of New York” and “Aviator,” both of which Oscar-nominated, and both flawed for different reasons, Scorsese is back on terra firma with a movie that’s right up his alley, one that’s linked directly not only to “GoodFellas,” but also to “Mean Streets,” back in 1973.

Like Michael Mann (who, incidentally, produced Scorsese’s “Aviator”), Scorsese is one of American cinema’s strongest proponents of film noir, infusing most of his films with darkly humorous approach and quintessentially noirish themes, motifs, and visuals. Nonetheless, unlike Mann, particularly in his last, disappointing effort, “Miami Vice,” in which striking style triumphed over a routine narrative, Scorsese is trying to find new subjects, with varying degrees of success, to which he can apply his singular noirish paradigm.

The story of "The Departed" is vaguely based on the 2002 brilliant Hong Kong thriller, "Infernal Affairs," which achieved great success in Asia before being released (briefly) in the U.S. in 2004. The collaboration with writer William Monahan (“Kingdom of Heaven”), an Irish-American native of Boston, proves fruitful in ways that the teaming with Paul Schrader was a generation ago in movies like “Taxi Driver” and “Raging Bull.” Monahan and Scorsese treat their movie as one inspired by “Internal Affairs,” rather than a remake per se.

Putting aside that film’s distinctive milieu, they have created a different setting--South Boston--with different actions and subplots. Monahan has judiciously expanded the scope of that movie, adding new characters, and enlarging one key role, mobster Frank Costello (played by Jack Nicholson), which was minor in the original saga.

Collaborating for the third time with Scorsese, after "Gangs of New York" and "The Aviator," Leonardo DiCaprio gives his first truly mature performance; it’s the first film in which he doesn’t look “boyish.” Along with DiCaprio, the film stars Matt Damon, Jack Nicholson, Mark Wahlberg, Martin Sheen, Alec Baldwin, and Vera Framiga, which makes “The Departed” as this year's the best-cast feature.

The story centers on two complex and morally ambiguous copes: Colin Sullivan (Matt Damon) and Billy Costigan (Leonardo DiCaprio). Smart and unabashedly ambitious, Colin appears to be on the fast track of Massachusetts State Police Department. The Department’s Elite Special Investigations Unit is waging an all-out war to take down the city's cop organized crime ring from the inside--their goal is to end the reign of powerful mob boss Costello (Nicholson).

In contrast, Billy is street-smart, tough, and suffers from a violent temper that has cost him his badge and eventually lands him back on the rough streets of South Boston, where he is recruited into Costello's ranks.

The story is about how two young men are shaped by the three major forces in their lives: the police, the crime group, and the neighborhood. In a flashback, we see Costello taking Colin as a young boy and making him into a seeming pillar of the community so he can rise up in the hierarchy of the state police. But, in reality, he is Costello's inside man.

In contrast, Billy’s determination to become a police officer is rooted in his desire to escape his upbringing. Billy comes from an underworld background and has many chips stacked against him. Joining the police because he has no other options, he wants to do things differently than his family. Ironically, Billy is asked to go undercover and pretend to be the very man he was determined not to become.

Billy is the perfect material for the police to send undercover, because he comes from South Boston's working-class element. He is put in the position to join Costello's crew, but he has really been set up to rat on Costello.

The one main character who is neither a cop nor a criminal is also its only woman: Madolyn (Vera Farmiga), a psychiatrist who specializes in dealing with troubled people on both sides of the law. In a twist of fate, Madolyn becomes another unwitting link between Colin, who she dates romantically, and Billy, the man she starts out seeing professionally.

For Billy, Madolyn is the only emotional connection he has, and the one person he can confide in, though in a limited way, because he can't reveal anything about himself, or what he's doing. As his counselor, Madolyn tries to help him initially, but then a stronger personal bind develops between them.

Like most of Scorsese’s films, “The Departed” is about sin, guilt, and redemption. Trying to redeem himself and not just be a product of his environment, Billy he ends up deep in a situation that's extremely dangerous. There are moments when he could be easily caught as the "rat," and everything begins to cave in around him.

Damon's and DiCaprio’s characters are, of course, two sides of the same coin; they even hail from the same neighborhood. Colin chooses one path, and Billy chooses another, but their lives are fatefully intertwined in ways they themselves could never understand. Ultimately, running on parallel tracks, Billy and Colin must--and do-- end up on a collision course.

The film gradually becomes a tense cat-and-mouse chase, based on information and misinformation, conveyed via computer and cell phones; here is one film that couldn’t exist without the cellular technology (for reasons that cannot be disclosed here). However, this being a noir policier-—and a quintessential Scorsese feature-—neither man is what he seems to be. As they work at cross-purposes, Colin and Billy are plunged into a dangerous game in which the stakes are high, really high.

Each man becomes consumed by his double life, gathering information about the plans and counter-plans of the operation he has penetrated. But when it becomes clear to the gangsters and the police that they have a mole in their midst, Billy and Colin find themselves in constant danger of being caught and exposed to the enemy. Each must race to uncover the identity of the other man in time to save himself.

Duplicity and deceit are manifest in Scorsese’s film, but, thematically, borrowing from noir, “The Departed” is soaked with the logic of a well-constructed crime melodrama (in the positive sense of the term) and the fatalism of a tragedy, focusing on the postmodern issue of identity, namely, what constitutes identity(a fluid concept to begin with), and what happens when people depart from what they really should be doing, instead playing roles allotted to them by social agencies.

In this film, Scorsese takes the crime-gangster genre and turns it into something different, more compelling and original. The uniquely American story involves the Irish underworld, the police force and the corruption, within and without that agency, which make the tale more relevant. The film's depiction of the characters and their attitudes toward the world, in both its public and personal domains, is uncompromising.

The production benefits from the cooperation of Thomas B. Duffy, a 30-year-vet of the Mass. State Police, who served as a technical consultant. Though the characters are placed in a specifically Irish-Italian milieu, as a story of trust and loyalty, betrayal and deception, it could be found in any big city around the world.

Giving the strongest performance of the all-star cast,DiCaprio excels in conveying the conflict of a young man who has gotten himself into a bad situation and then wonders what the hell he's doing there. DiCaprio renders an intense, volcanic performance, based as much on gestures as on words, resulting in high-impact emotional turn. Of the three roles, he played for Scorsese, this is by far DiCaprio's most impressive.

While the story is set entirely in Boston, principal photography was executed in and around Boston and New York. Most of the exterior scenes were shot in the Boston Common, Boston Harbor, Chinatown, and, of course, South Boston, known to the locals as "Southie." Traveling outside of the city, the company also shot in the neighboring towns of Braintree, Quincy, and Dorchester (where cast member Mark Wahlberg comes from).

Production designer Kristi Zea (who had previously collaborated on "GoodFellas") and longtime Scorsese vet cinematographer Michael Ballhaus capture the specific style of New England architecture, like the three-story wooden houses with front or back porches on each floor, and what they label as 'brutalist' mode of architecture, including the City Hall.

Outside of Downtown Boston, most of the structures are low, with plenty of sky view.
Juxtaposed with the city's historical landmarks, the imposing, cement-gray Hurley Building, in the heart of Boston's Government Square, was selected to serve as the exterior for the utilitarian headquarters of the Massachusetts State Police.

The team created the interiors of the headquarters on a cavernous soundstage in the Brooklyn's Williamsburg section, with the gray and brown palette of the existing structures.

As noted, “The Departed” is strongly shaped by the noir vocabulary. The film is lit like a black-and-white work, especially in the police station, which doesn't have much color. Ballhaus takes a similar approach to lighting the police headquarters, normally lit with fluorescents, thus creating a wash of light with no tension. Instead, Ballhaus uses direct light and shadows to add variety and texture to the atmosphere.

That said, whenever used, color creates an intense dramatic effect. Costume designer Sandy Powell utilized color to set Nicholson's Costello apart from the rest. Most of the characters wear uniforms or ordinary street clothes in neutral tones of brown, gray, and beige. Not so in the case of Nicholson, perhaps due to his interpretation, which carries his role to an extreme. Consistent with the view that Costello has so much power he can wear whatever he wants and no one would dare question it, Nicholson is clad in orange shirt with blue jackets and leoprad robes, or other lurid colors that call attention to his idiosyncratic character--and acting.

This being a vantage Scorsese picture, “The Departed” is richly dense with references and homages to other directors. Taking a cue from Hitchcock’s “Marnie” and its use of red, there’s a deliberate injection of red within the predominantly colorless settings. Whenever there’s red on screen, it stands out, because most of the costumes and sets are almost monochromatic. Scorsese utilizes this specific color as a subliminal message, as a sign of risk and danger, with blood being the most obvious correlate.

Speaking of blood, the last reel is particularly violent, and some of the shootouts are deliberately staged in grotesquely extremist way. Two climactic encounters owe (perhaps unintentionally) a visual debt to Tarantino’s “Reservoir Dogs” and “Pulp Fiction.”

The letter X is also used symbolically, on windows, walls, and floors, as a tribute to the 1932 movie "Scarface," directed by Howard Hawks and produced by Howard Hughes (the subject of "Aviator"), in which the X has special significance in the text.

The X is, of course, a sign of death, and it’s used in the film in both subtle and blatant mode. The concept of death harkens back to the film's title: The Catholic Church refers to the dead as “the faithful departed.” Among other things, “The Departed” is about faithfulness—to self as well as to others.

Finally, I recognized an explicit allusion to Carol Reed's “The Third Man.” Toward the end, there’s a poignant scene at the cemetery where Vera Farmiga walks by her lover Matt Damon without looking at him, recreating the scene between Alida Valli and Joseph Cotten in that 1950 masterpiece.

The Illusionist movie review

The Illusionist----****

Does the title, The Illusionist refer to the main charachter or does it refer to its director, Neil Burger? Because The Illusionist is just that; an illusion. As this story of love and magic unfolds, it became very apparent that Burger's script and directing style is fairly immature. It appears to be really good, but the use of smoke and mirrors (quite literally) can't hide this film's mediocrity for the full 2 hours.

Eisenheim (Norton), a one-time poor peasant of the country side, has become an extremely proficient stage magician in turn of the century Vienna. During one of his infamous shows, Eisenheim asks for a volunteer from the audience. The fiancee of the Crown Prince (who is also in attendance) volunteers willingly and it is then that Eisenheim discover this woman (Biel) is his long lost love from their adolescent years. What ensues is Eisenheim's plot to get his girl back and expose the corruptness of the Crown Prince, all the while keeping the chief inspector (Giamatti) off his back. Of course tricks and illusions come into play as the tensions mount. As his illusions become more and more ellaborate, the people of the town begin to think these aren't tricks at all, but he may actually have a divine power. To be honest, the audience in the theater doesn't know either. I went back and forth trying to decide for myself, which was a lot of fun.

First of all, the performances are brilliant. Brilliant. Giamatti is always amazing and he is no different here. Within 5 minutes, Giamatti's charisma and strength as an actor is brought to bare and a huge smile crossed my lips as I knew this was going to be a treat. His grumpy disposition and those huge, piercing eyes were perfect for this pseudo-villainous, against typecast role. Edward Norton doesn't make bad performances or bad movies for that matter, and his facial features were perfect for this role of a mysterious outsider who conjures spirits and mesmerizews people. Rufus Sewell, who plays the ferocious and villainous Crown Prince Leopold surprised me a great deal. I recognized him from the Zorro series and Tristan & Isolde. He was deliciously mean and corrupt and reminded me very much of an older Jude Law. Throw Jessica Biel into the mix for.... well, the hottie factor (an unfair comment since she does actually show some decent acting chops) and we've got an A-list cast that is nothing short of amazing.

As the story went along, especially after about 45 minutes, I began to think to myself, "This is really good and it may just have a shot at an Oscar nod." But as it began to wind down, it became apparent that the story, although original and interesting, was actually fairly predictable and kind of corny; especially the very end. However, although I had it predicted correctly (as did everyone I'm sure, as it was actually very obvious), there were pangs in my chest of uncertainty. This coupled with the amazing performances and the fun-ness factor of the illsusions kept me very interested.

To make the illusion more convincing, the producers have hired the great Phillip Glass for the film's score. It is truly amazing and some of Glass' best work in my opinion as it really sets the mood well. It is very reminiscent of a Hitchcock film or Basic Instinct. Perfect.

Since this is 19th centruy Vienna, of course the costumes and sets have to be convincing. And they are. They are, they are, they are. From Biel's beautiful gowns to the Crown Prince's amazing looking uniform, down to even the peasant folk, the costume designers may be the only group from this film to come away with an Academy Award. They are gorgeous and eye-catching and add a great deal to this movie's style and mood. In one of the first scenes of the film, we see Giamatti's character walking down the long hallway of the royal palace to meet with the Crown Prince. The hallways and main office in the palace are fantastic feats of design and authenticity. Bordering on distracting actually, are these great costumes and sets. The only disappointing factor was we never get to see the town from a distance. Everything is shot on a set and it is apparent. But that's nit-picking.

So it comes down to this; almost everything in this film teeters on perfect: the performances, the music, the dialogue (yes, even the corny lines), the sets, the costumes, the music and the illusions (some of which were "real"- i.e. not CGI). There is every ingredient to make this movie great. The only reason I can't give it a 100%, thumbs up, is for the cliche and predictable ending. It lacked a true climax or an original idea. If not for this, I would put this movie in the best of the year category. I still recommend it to all. It's a very good time and in fact, I would even watch it again simply for the fantabulous performances and to try and figure out how some of those tricks were pulled off (remember, many were true magic tricks, supposedly). So I recommend giving this one a try, you won't believe your eyes.

Little Miss Sunshine movie review

Little Miss Sunshine----****

Olive (Breslin) is a young girl who dreams of winning a beauty pageant. Her parents Richard (Kinnear) and Sheryl (Collette) decide to drive Olive to California so she can compete in the Little Miss Sunshine pageant. However, Richard's father (Alan Arkin), their son Dwayne (Paul Dano), and Sheryl's brother Frank (Steve Carell) also come along for the ride, and it's not long before everything starts to go wrong for the traveling family.

Charming, funny, and always involving, Little Miss Sunshine is a film with something for everyone. A fine script by Michael Arndt is bolstered by a number of excellent performances, and the direction remains focused at all times.

Young Breslin is simply a revelation as Olive. Her range is extraordinary, and she really makes the role her own. Kinnear and Collette are both ideal as her parents, and Dano, rather ordinary in The King, makes up for that with a fine performance here. Arkin is an absolute delight as Richard's foul-mouthed father. This sort of character is tricky to pull off, principally because there's no guarantee the audience will like them, but Arkin allows us to see that there's a good heart behind the gruff exterior. Carell gives a very fine performance too, particularly when you consider this is rather new turf for him.

There are a number of things that make Little Miss Sunshine work so well. The most important reason is that the family comes across as real. This is partly due to the performances, but also because of the writing. Each character has strengths and flaws, and every single one of them has to come to terms with these as the film progresses. The dialogue between the family members is extraordinarily realistic, the characters are properly fleshed out, and the cast have a wonderful chemistry together.

The other main reason why the film is such a delight is because it accomplishes so many things. Little Miss Sunshine is essentially a black comedy, but it's often rather touching, poignant, and moving as well. The way these elements combine is excellent, with the more emotional moments never permitted to become overly saccharine or trite. The film even manages to include some decent satire as well, and the way it moves between these elements ensures that it's never predictable.

Credit is also due to Dayton and Faris, whose direction is so well suited you'd think they wrote the screenplay. They never allow the comedic moments to become silly (even though a couple of them have the potential to do so), and they don't force the audience to wallow in pity every time something bad happens to the family. They display a respect and an understanding of the writing that isn't always seen from directors.

I am genuinely at a loss to think of films similar to Little Miss Sunshine. Very few films have so adeptly woven extremely black comedy and such a charming story together. Perhaps the most recent example would be As Good as It Gets, but even that doesn't offer comedy as deliciously wicked as what Little Miss Sunshine has on display. When awards season rolls around Little Miss Sunshine may well find itself ignored, but some of the performances in particular are deserving of accolades.

Monday, September 18, 2006

Life Is beautiful

Life Is beautiful---****1/2

Vita è bella, La(Life Is beautiful)-----1997

Made in Italy by actor and director Roberto Benigini
This flick is not about racism but about the human spirit
Life Is Beautiful shows how humour can set the spirit free
even in the most darkest circumstances of life.

In 1939 Italy,Guido(Roberto Benigni) is a carefree Jewish person who wants to open bookstore
With his amazing sense of humour he woos a beautiful school teacher Dora(Nicoletta Braschi)
Later on they marry and story moves to 5 years later.Now they have a son Joshua(Giorgio Cantarini)
1945 during WW2 they all are captured by fascists and sent to death camps.Guido makes
his son believe that this is actually a game of 'hide and seek' in which one have to get 1000 points to be a prize winner which is a tank

The first half is full of comedy and humour and one might think its romantic comedy
But second half takes a u turn and makes the movie intense and tragic yet lighter
The second half gives a feeling of 'Schindlers List'.But this movie is not as brutal as that
rather we see a deeply touching story told with imagination and humour
Inspite of second half being dark and grim,light and comical moments are interwoven with death and misery all around

Life Is Beautiful is a daring,original story
As an innovative director and a supremely talented actor.
Critic Roger Ebert,the first person ever to win Pulitzer Prize for film criticism says
...Guido uses the only gift at his command to protect his son.
If he had a gun, he would shoot at the Fascists. If he had an army,
he would destroy them.He is a clown, and comedy is his weapon.

I couldnot have agreed and decribed it more profoundly

Guido in profound fashion, Guido personifies the axiom "Life is what you make it".
It is an unexpected,oddly passionate yet deeply emotional portrayal of a father's sacrificial love for his son.


Roberto Benigini popularly known as Jim Carrey of Italy gives his lifetime performance
Its unimaginable to believe the way he portrays humour even in heart wrenching and emotionally driven scenes which can put many audience on the verge of tears
He got well deserved best actor Oscar that year

Roberto Benigini...again truimphs as a writer and director.The scene where he is caught and sees his son hiding leaves you just speechless.Even in that haunting scene by dispalying humour he makes his son believe its part of the game.A class act

Life is beautiful is not about barbarism and brutality but about human spirit.About hope for future
Its about victory of hope over despair,light over dark and also this deeply affecting film triumphs humour over hatred
In the battle against barbarism,Benigni is saying, there are also the weapons of joy and imagination.
It makes u believe that life is not what happens to us,but how we react to it.We must learn to enjoy every moment of our life.
It is up to us to make it beautiful.

And one can assume the greatness of flick as inspite of being made in Italy this timeless classic doesnot only got oscar nomination for 'Best Foreign' language film but it got 7 Oscar
nominations in leading categories out of which it won 3 oscars.

Winner of Grand Jury Prize at Cannes Film Festival 'Life is Beutiful' poignantly shows us that in the midst of dark ugliness of death the light of life shines at its 'Most Beautiful'

Unarguably among the greatest flicks.....

..........4.5/5

Friday, September 01, 2006

World Trade Center :Movie Review

World Trade Center---***1/2

At the end of April, British documentarian Paul Greengrass gave us a harrowing re-creation of the only one of four hijacked airliners which didn't reach its target in the docudrama United 93. Now, American filmmaker Oliver Stone recounts the memories of two Port Authority (PA) policemen who survived the attacks on the Twin Towers on 11 September 2001.

The name "Oliver Stone" conjures up thoughts of conspiracy theories and the like. However, in World Trade Center, Stone has given us a film based solely on the recollections of the two policemen (and their wives) that this story follows. It is a story about the human spirit. It is about fear and fraility as well as strength and courage.

Nicolas Cage plays John McLoughlin, a patrol sergeant with the Port Authority stationed at the authority's midtown bus terminal. On the morning of 11 September, McLoughlin awakens early to prepare for his day at work. Stone deftly lets us know without a whole lot of exposition that there's trouble in the McLoughlin marriage. The sergeant rolls out of bed without so much as disturbing his wife. He showers, dresses and checks in on his children. He then makes the drive into New York City to begin his day.

Through a variety of establishing shots and background radiocasts, Stone lets us know that it is what passes (then) as a normal day in New York. Meanwhile, rookie patrolman Will Jimeno (Michael Peña) jumps in his SUV and heads to work as well. After a time, Stone takes us to morning roll call at the bus terminal's police sub-station where McLoughlin makes routine assignments for the day.

Jimeno, after bantering with his buddy Dominick Pezzulo (Jay Hernandez), heads out to Eighth Avenue to begin his assignment. Our first inkling that something is wrong is when Jimeno hears a jet roar overhead and we see the shadow of an airliner against a nearby building. In short order, the various members of the squad hear a code on their radios which they recognize as an emergency order to report back to the substation. As Jimeno, Pezzulo and their colleagues return, they see newscasts of the crippled North Tower. Speculation starts to run rampant about what has happened at the Trade Center.

McLoughlin assembles a team and commandeers a city bus for his team's trip downtown. On the bus, the patrolmen speculate on what has actually happened. One of the patrolmen has talked to his wife and learned that a second plane has hit the South Tower. Meanwhile, in a department Suburban, McLoughlin and his lieutenant (Kassimatis, played by Nick Damici) discuss the rescue plan for the Towers. It's here where we learn that McLoughlin helped draw up emergency plans for the Trade Center complex after the 1993 terrorist bombing. However, McLoughlin lets Kassimatis know that there's nothing in their plans to cover the scenario facing them.

Once downtown, McLoughlin asks for volunteers to go into the Towers. After some hesitation, Jimeno, Pezzulo and a few others step forward. What follows is nightmarish as McLoughlin and his team set about gathering equipment to help rescue people in the Towers. There are sheets of paper everywhere, falling debris, and the frightful sounds of explosions and the buildings shuddering.

Just as McLoughlin's team has gathered all the equipment that they need, the tower above them starts to shudder and McLoughlin, realizing what is happening, shouts “Run!” McLoughlin and his team head for an area between the two towers which McLoughlin knows holds the best chance for their survival. However, we soon learn that only McLoughlin, Jimeno and Pezzulo seem to have survived.

From this point forward, we're watching what those three officers did to survive and what those above did to rescue them. Interspersed with these images are how the officers' families deal with the uncertainty of not knowing whether their husbands are dead or alive. We particularly follow the tribulations of Donna McLoughlin (Maria Bello) and Allison Jimeno (Maggie Gyllenhaal) as they wait for word about their missing husbands while trying to cope with their families around them.

What happens to McLoughlin, Jimeno and Pezzulo after the towers collapse is positively frightening. Stone doesn't spare us any intensity as we view what happens below and above the rubble.

I should mention the performance of Michael Shannon who plays ex-Marine Dave Karnes. Karnes, who was an accountant who decided to go to New York to help search for survivors of the attack. Karnes calmly leaves work, gets his hair cut, dresses in Marine fatigues, and heads for Ground Zero. Save for the fact that this part of the story is based in reality, this would seem incredulous. Karnes is single-minded in his attempt to find survivors. When he, along with fellow ex-Marine PFC Dave Thomas (William Mapother), finds the buried PA patrolmen, it brings one of the few uplifting moments in the film. When Jimeno pleads for Karnes not to leave, Karnes simply states “You are our mission!”

[The identity, until last week, of the second Marine was unknown to investigators and filmmakers. However, it is now known that he is former Marine Sgt. Jason Thomas. You can read about Karnes and Thomas in the articles cited at the end of this essay.]

World Trade Center is heart-wrenching while at the same time exasperating. Unlike United 93, which more or less took place in real time, this film takes place in compressed time. With the amount of narrative that Stone has to cover, that shouldn't be such a big problem. However, despite a running time of two hours and five minutes, I would like to have seen just a tad more exposition leading up to the critical events. Also, since a great deal of the narrative takes place beneath the rubble, the film tends to be claustrophobic and sluggish. The nature of the material also tends to make this film much more melodramatic than United 93.

All in all, this is a film worth seeing. It exposes the raw elements of human nature but also the triumph of human spirit. It makes an excellent bookend with United 93.

At the close of the film, we learn that 2,749 people died in the Twin Towers attack. Only 20 people survived.

Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby:Movie Review

Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby-----***1/2/*****

Columbia Pictures

Year Released: 2006
MPAA Rating: PG-13
Director: Adam McKay
Writers: Will Ferrell, Adam McKay
Cast: Will Ferrell, John C. Reilly, Sacha Baron Cohen, Gary Cole, Michael Clarke Duncan, Leslie Bibb, Jane Lynch, Amy Adams.

Review by Rob Vaux

As you are no doubt aware, Talladega Nights: The Ballad of Ricky Bobby stars Will Ferrell, who many people consider tremendously funny. I find his humor more sporadic than hysterical, but he's hit the target enough times to give a movie like this at least modest potential. Thankfully, Talladega Nights fulfills it with admirable professionalism, delivering another idiot man-child for Ferrell to inhabit while broadly skewering the admittedly easy target of NASCAR culture. Its trump card, however, comes not just in the star, but in the very funny supporting cast chosen to back him up: people you've likely seen before but whose names don't register on the National Fame Barometer. Names like Gary Cole, Office Space's Boss from Hell, who rocks the house as Ferrell's shiftless dad. Or Jane Lynch -- last seen freaking out Steve Carell with details of her deflowering in The 40-Year-Old Virgin -- as Ferrell's cheerfully mordant mother. There's John C. Reilly slam-dunking another doofus best friend, Molly Shannon getting her groove on as an alcoholic trophy wife, and even Michael Clarke Duncan raising more than his share of unexpected snickers. That the film wastes the wonderful Amy Adams is less a case of ignoring her brilliance than simply lacking the time to let her strut. With such an army behind him, Ferrell need only find the right tone and step up to the plate. If he misses, they're still going to knock it out of the park.

And that's all that matters for movies like Talladega Nights. Are we laughing? Yes? Then throw away the checklist, because our money is officially well spent. Ferrell and director/co-writer Adam McKay find fertile ground in the Red State tackiness of professional racing, but like all good satirists, they temper their jabs with heartfelt affection. Their fulcrum is Ferrell's Ricky Bobby, stunningly dim king of the NASCAR circuit whose win-at-all-costs philosophy consumes every inch of his distressingly limited brain space. Like Anchorman's Ron Burgundy, he lives in a fantasyland of insecure male adolescence, complete with a toadying pal (Reilly) happy to always come in second and a bling-laden missus (Leslie Bibb, another standout) who seems cloned from Jessica Simpson's hair extensions. Trouble enters his paradise with the arrival of Jean Girard (Sacha Baron Cohen, another standout), who embodies the unholy trifecta reviled by all of Bobby's ilk: he's French, he's intellectual, and he's very very gay. Even worse, he's a better racer than Bobby, and a few easy humiliations soon reduce Ferrell's Champion Good Ole Boy to a blubbering wreck. It will take the love of a patient woman (Adams), a newfound sense of humility, and a few manly-man lessons involving blindfolds and cranky mountain lions to get him back into the winner's circle.

The faux machismo of Bobby's lifestyle makes a tasty satirical snack as Farrell and McKay again look to deflate the hubristic preening that passes for male emotional development in our society. Gauche materialism, xenophobia, and the "second place is the first loser" mentality of Ugly America take it on the chin as well, giving Talladega Nights a timely feel even as it apes Anchorman's winning formula. Obvious swipes are the order of the day, but McKay still knows how to invest them with insight and wit, and he never takes the buffoonery for granted. The second half runs low on gas, as the formulaic plot sputters a bit and the guffaws of the first hour slowly diminish to quieter chuckles, but even when it stumbles, someone amid the standout ensemble is always ready to pick up the slack.

And for all of its barbs, it retains a core of sweetness at its heart. Talladega Nights mocks NASCAR, to be sure, but it never shortchanges the excitement and atmosphere that have made the circuit such a phenomenon. McKay keeps the racing scenes pumped full of adrenaline, and though he spares nothing in assaulting the zeitgeist surrounding them, he never questions why people should love NASCAR, or devalues the immense skills displayed by Bobby's (hopefully brighter) real-world counterparts. Adam Sandler's films leave a bad taste in the mouth because they have fundamentally nasty souls -- an ugly, bullying mentality that displays open contempt for their chosen targets. Talladega Nights, on the other hand, loves what it ridicules, even at its most chiding. For all his stupidity and arrogance, and for all the appalling shortcomings of the bubble he inhabits, Ricky Bobby is basically a decent guy underneath. Talladega Nights always keeps that gentleness in mind, even as it refuses to let him off the hook for all of his dipshit idiocy. Its laughs are broad, but consistent, and its creators adore the subject enough to find all the proper tickle spots. Talladega Nights requires nothing more in order to cruise happily across the finish line.

Invincible:movie review

Invincible (2006)----***
The latest in a recent string of fact-based, sports-themed dramas from Disney, Invincible neatly balances the inevitable, Frank Capra-esque sentiment with a welcome dash of blue collar grit and rowdy good humor. This engaging, classic underdog yarn inspired by the remarkable story of Seventies-era Philadelphia Eagles player Vince Papale may not break any new cinematic ground or have the emotional texture of Friday Night Lights, but on its own populist filmmaking terms, Invincible succeeds without yanking on the heartstrings too blatantly.

Cinematographer-turned-director Ericson Core and his production team effectively capture the look and feel of Philadelphia, circa 1976, when the Philly's rabid football fans were showing little of their city's famed brotherly love towards the Eagles, then in the midst of a humiliating, eleven-season losing streak. Hard times have also hit schoolteacher Vince Papale (Mark Wahlberg), who was ditched by his wife and lost his job in crushing succession. Just when it seems he's hit the proverbial rock bottom, however, Vince gets a second chance, courtesy of the new Eagles coach, Dick Vermeil (Greg Kinnear), who decides to hold public tryouts for the NFL team. At the urging of his buddies Tommy (Kirk Acevedo), Pete (Michael Kelly), and Max (Michael Rispoli), Vince reluctantly goes to the tryout—and surprises everyone, including himself, by surviving the first cut. Immediately embraced by the media as the local boy made good, Papale receives a far chillier reception from the Eagles players, who dismiss him as an over-age amateur—that is, when they're not pulverizing him on the field. But in time-honored underdog fashion, Vince gradually proves that Vermeil was right to pluck him out of obscurity.

Making a solid directorial debut, Corr generally refrains from milking Papale's story for maximum syrupy uplift. To that end, he's aided enormously by his cast, which also includes Elizabeth Banks (Seabiscuit), who brings a refreshing spikiness to what could have been a thankless love-interest role as Janet, a pretty barmaid and adamant New York Giants fan. She brings much-needed energy to her scenes with Wahlberg, who's likable, albeit a tad recessive, as the modest, "regular Joe" hero. But if the sleepy-eyed Walhberg appears to lack the larger-than-life charisma of a true movie star, he's certainly a convincing and sympathetic presence in Invincible, especially in the football scenes, which Corr shoots with an exciting, bracing immediacy. Yes, Invincible has its fair share of earnest, "one for the Gipper"-style moments that are probably unavoidable in sports-themed films, yet these moments don't undermine what is ultimately a stirring crowd-pleaser about a real-life gridiron version of that other Philly underdog, Sylvester Stallone's Rocky.

Friday, July 14, 2006

Superman Returns:Movie Review

***1/2/****

Does the world really needs Superman??

While Lois Lane ex-girlfriend of Superman has written off about him.She wrote 'The world does not need Superman' and she won prizes and medals for this article too.

But Clark Kent says:You wrote that the world doesn't need a saviour, but every day I hear people crying for one.

'The Man of Still' is back after a gap of 20 years

Positive aspects: This Superman has soul.Inspite of all those superpowers which makes him god alike Bryan Singer have shown his inside feelings Brilliant special effects

Negative: Love Story--Its quite irony..really irony for me to write that which is the strong point of the movie also becomes its weak points When love story seems to get overdose and hampers the progress.The pace lacks

Performance:

Brandon Routh:Its quite unbelievable to imagine playing the iconic character played by Christopher Reeve during 80's by anyone else Doubts galore surrounded whether a bartender could pull off this character?? Yes he does.He had played the portrayal of Superman and Clark Kent so much convincingly that its impossible for the makers to take any other actor for the sequels. From the Superpower guy saving the world to a normal reporter Clark Kent he is outstanding.From the man flying in air to an emotional person who have lost his love he is incredible One sentence--'Bartender have become a star and a convincing actor'

Kate Bosworth:She looks good and acts good.Her performance is not on par with Brandon Routh but a good performance overall

Parker Posey:She is good and carries the character of Kitty Kowalski in same vein as it was left

Sam Huntington is good adding some humorous elements to the flick

Kid is so cute

Now Kevin Spacey.Anyone who have seen the flicks of this two time Oscar winning actor(usual suspects,American beauty) even without watching this flick can tell that he will be good in the flick He takes the character of Lex Luther to another level.He brings charm in the flick whenever he comes on the screen

Now finally Bryan Singer,the director---Bryan singer had himself stated that Superman had been his favourite superhero character And he shows how much respect he gives to this 'iconic character'. From making the best ever thriller(The Usual Suspects) and generating a new breed of superheroes(X-Men) and going back for making a sequel of the 'American Icon' he had came a long way And being so young he will go a long way.Thanks Singer for making the 'dad' of all superheroes so superhuman

So,so what if Superman costume is not good looking and kewl in todays perspective....so what if superman getup does not look kewl as Batman,Spidey or X-Men But 'Man of Steel' has a heart of gold.Whether its Batman or Spiderman everyone's path for saving the world starts from revenge.Later on they turn for good cause But SuperMan had always been there fighting for truth and justice.And his mission does not starts with revenge.This makes me to give him the most respect of all superheroes

Now the big question floating prior to its release..'Whether SuperMan beats Batman Begins in terms character and storytelling' Frankly no.And its quite unfair to expect that too.Cause Batman Begins started from beginning and Spiderman-2 was 2nd flick of the series,SUperman Returns is the third flick of their franchise So,the 'character stabilisation' and all such things cant be as much strong.However SR will top Batman Begins in terms of Box office

We have never seen superman so much struggling...a bullet shot straight into the eyes,got beaten badly and left into the sea with crystal in back.SuperMan was never so much in trouble

While the first half is slow paced,second half before the climax is as fast as it could have been and does not let u even drop your eyelid. The special effects are sensational and mindblowing.But the climax again slows down the film And pace of the film had been the major problem with the audience.Many people can find it bit slow

In the climax of the movie,when lois lane and kid went on to see Superman,we see mother(who have raised him) of Superman struggling and standing with normal people to see his son And i ran into emotion seeing that being ex-gf how lois lane easily meets Superman but her mother not cause no1 knows her. The old woman stands there with emotion and sadness on her face

A worthy sequel.The wait is finally over

So long SuperMan,where have u been??

Pirates of The Caribbean:Dead Man's Christ--Movie review

'Pirates' sequel long but occasionally strong
By Glenn Whipp, Film Critic

***/****

Just like its predecessor, "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" is an exercise in forgiveness, asking its audience to sit through the bloat to get to the treasure.

Blowhard director Gore Verbinski gives us two of everything — villains, self-sacrificing fathers, love triangles — when one would have sufficed. He never stages an action sequence that he doesn't want to repeat for lessened effect. The result is a 21/2-hour movie that starts slowly and only gets up to full sailing speed by its last hour.

Johnny Depp redeemed the first "Pirates" movie, and if they gave Oscars the way baseball crowns its league MVPs — for contributions to the success of the team — Depp would have won best actor, hands-down. Take him away from that 2003 film, and you're left with an empty, unwatchable spectacle.

Depp, of course, returns in "Dead Man's Chest,"
again playing everyone's favorite, mascara-wearing prancing pirate, this time leaning more on the character's Pepe Le Pew inspiration, though Keith Richards still comes through, too. While the thrill of discovering the character and Depp's performance is gone, it's still a joy watching him play this narcissistic, word-slurring anti-hero. Just seeing Depp run — and Capt. Jack runs a lot in this movie — is to behold a Chuck Jones cartoon come to life, and it makes me smile every time.

Given how Depp so thoroughly stole the movie from Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley the first time around, you wish producer Jerry Bruckheimer would have been smart enough to jettison the bland characters and let Sparrow fly alone this time around. But that would violate the laws of sequels, not to mention run the risk of alienating the teen girls who blush at the sight of Bloom.

The problem is, credited screenwriters Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio struggle in putting the three main characters back together, delivering an opening hour that is incoherent and largely uninvolving. Separated lovers Will (Bloom) and Elizabeth (Knightley) are present only because one of the villains (the boring, non-CG one) wants something from Jack.

Meanwhile, the other villain, the astounding, computer-generated, squid-faced Davy Jones (Bill Nighy) wants something from Jack as well — his soul. This is where the movie gets good, if not great: when Jones' submerged Flying Dutchman ship pops out of the ocean, revealing its barnacle-covered, bizarro crew of the aquatic undead, adversaries more than worthy of Capt. Jack. One other item of note: Jones commands a giant squid that makes the beastie in "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea" look like a wee jellyfish.

Davy Jones and his crew are fantastic,
flawless creations — you can't take your eyes off them. John Knoll's Industrial Light & Magic visual effects team have gone above and beyond the call here, creating a band of characters that impeccably serve the story without needlessly calling attention to themselves.

There's a Hammerhead Shark Man, a Hermit Crab Head ... really it's a rogues gallery straight out of Dick Tracy. Although they're almost entirely computer creations, they feel as real as the flesh-and-blood humans.

More real, in fact. If Depp was the Oscar nomination waiting to happen for "Black Pearl," it's Nighy's turn for "Dead Man's Chest." Nighy has spent his entire career elevating bad movies ("Underworld") or turning good films into near-great ones ("Shaun of the Dead"). Here, even though everything about the squid-faced Jones, even the eyes, are artificial, Nighy's performance comes through loud and clear, full of magnificent menace, a villain for the ages.

His presence makes the prospect of next year's third "Pirates" movie palatable, even if, given the progression of the series, Verbinski pushes the running time to 3 hours. These are movies that cry out for the "scene selection" feature on the DVD.

But when the scenes work and cook, they're the essence of summer moviemaking. They shiver your timbers and make you feel like a kid.

Source:http://www.dailynews.com/filmreviews/ci_4014836

Sunday, April 30, 2006

Ice Age:The Meltdown:movie review


***/*****
Ice Age: The Meltdown (2006) / Animation-Comedy

MPAA Rated: PG for some mild language and innuendo
Running Time: 90 min.

Cast (voices): Ray Romano, John Leguizamo, Denis Leary, Queen Latifah, Seann William Scott, Josh Peck, Will Arnett, Jay Leno, Joseph Bologna, Alan Tudyk
Director: Carlos Saldanha
Screenplay: Peter Gaulke, Gerry Swallow

It's rare for a sequel to be on par with the original film, but Ice Age: The Meltdown is, thankfully, not a letdown. It's also less dark than the first entry, and doesn't carry the baggage of having to introduce the characters and scenario, which allows for a more free-flowing and buoyant effort. This one's an easy recommendation: if you liked Ice Age, you'll probably like this one, and if you didn't, you probably won't. I liked the original modestly, and came away with the same feeling here, although both have their share of weaknesses and lulls.

At the very least, at least you can't say that this film is bogged down by excessive plotting. As the ice of the dam surrounding the valley where our protagonists live begins to melt and break down, it becomes apparent that a flood of cataclysmic proportion threatens all life there. As the creatures begin their mass exodus to get to the other side, Manny (voiced by Ray Romano, Eulogy), the hapless mammoth, begins to lament the fact that he maybe the last surviving member of his species. His fears are allayed somewhat when he encounters a female mammoth named Ellie (Latifah, Beauty Shop), although he has a hard time convincing her that they need to keep their kind alive, especially as she believes herself to be a possum.

Ice Age: The Meltdown will probably fit the bill for the intended audience of young children, most of whom just enjoy seeing funny talking animals and lots of silly, high-energy slapstick. Adults will probably be mixed in their enjoyment, but if it keeps the young ones quiet for 90 minutes, at least they will have a pleasant experience outside of the movie itself. As with most current animated fare, there is an emphasis on fast-paced, frenetic action, which can be a bit hard to take for those that don't enjoyed frenzied, noisy films.

There are plenty of sight gags, and the usual mirth and mayhem, although they are mild in humor value, as the Ice Age series has run mostly on charm and affability, rather than on catchy zingers and genuine wit. Although many of the scenes are aimed at children, there is some mild innuendo that will keep the adults in the audience tuned in. This is the kind of film you go to for some escapism and a pleasant time, and along those lines, I suppose one can call The Meltdown a successful venture.

While this isn't nearly the caliber we might expect from a Pixar release, it's better than other recent 3D animated efforts, strictly for audiences that like these sorts of cutesy, computer-generated comedies. Top-notch production values help.

Source:http://www.qwipster.net/iceage2.htm

Scary Movie 4:movie review


SCARY MOVIE 4
RATING 2.5
(Director: David Zucker, PG-13, 88 min)


The scariest thing about this is that they’re still making these sequels (even if they promise this 4th edition is the final chapter of the "trilogy"). But as long as there is an audience who’ll pay money to go see these spoofs, we’ll continue to get a new version every couple of years. The good thing is that this is an improvement over the last couple of installments; the bad thing is that wouldn’t take much.

In this go round, the movie opens with Shaquille O'Neal and Dr. Phil having a Saw moment. Then the story settles down into a combination of The Grudge meets War of the Worlds – Cindy (Anna Faris) returns as a home caregiver for the nearly comatose Cloris Leachman and the ghost-kid hanging around the house. She lives right next door to Tom Ryan (Craig Bierko) who is trying to reconnect with his kids, hook up with Cindy, and save the world from invading aliens – when he’s not busy visiting Oprah (Debra Wilson) to dance on her couch and proclaim his love for Cindy.

This franchise doesn’t just spoof the horror films (probably because they need more material). To incorporate more movies into the mix, Cindy has a Million Dollar Baby flashback, while Tom’s friend Mahalik (Anthony Anderson) fondly remember his fishing trip a la Brokeback Mountain. Then Cindy learns she can get the answer to the alien problem if she and her old friend Brenda (Regina Hall) go to visit the set of The Village and speak to the one with the answers (Bill Pullman).

Some old characters return for a brief cameo (and a paycheck) including Carmen Electra (who gets to have the embarrassing toilet humor moment), Leslie Nielsen as President Harris, and Charlie Sheen as Tom Logan.

Scary Movie 4 starts with some promise – sure, it’s like sketch TV, but at least it’s SNL in the good years. Unfortunately, when it starts to fall apart, it takes a dive, then falls so fast the g-forces shock the audience into silence (no wait, they just got quiet because it stopped being funny). There aren’t even outtakes or any fun stuff during the credits to leave on a good note.

source:http://www.themoviechicks.com/early2006/mcrscarymovie4.html

V FOR VENDETTA:Movie reviews


***1/2/*****
V FOR VENDETTA

by Pete Vonder Haar
(2006-03-18)
2006, Rated R, 132 minutes, Warner Bros.

Famously disowned by creator Alan Moore (who, it should be noted, behaves towards every film adaptation of his works in the same way) and held back from release following 2005’s London subway bombings (for more “tweaking,” according to producer Joel Silver), this 20-year old story of a masked terrorist who does battle with the government of a fascist future Britain finally comes to theaters. Written by the Wachowski brothers and directed by Wachowski crony James McTeigue, it’s understandable that people might fear more of the same ridiculousness that permeated the “Matrix” sequels.



Happily, that’s not entirely the case. The core of Moore’s original tale – England as a security state, where news is generated by the government and undesirables (be they sexually, racially, or politically so) have long since been “removed,” their disappearance blamed on external forces. The lone challenger to the regime is a strange man in a mask with a penchant for quoting Shakespeare.




In this pleasant setting we’re introduced to young Evey Hammond (Natalie Portman) just as she is about to be assaulted by several of the government’s internal security agents (unfortunately referred to as “Fingermen”). However, before anything untoward takes place, a mysterious fellow in a Guy Fawkes mask appears. He explains, in a lengthy and obnoxiously alliterative soliloquy, that his name is “V,” right before he kills the three men and spirits Evey to the rooftops so she can watch while he blows up the Old Bailey.




V, in a happy coincidence, also temporarily takes over the TV station where Evey works, announcing his presence and telling everyone he’ll be blowing up Parliament as well in a year’s time. Evey is implicated in the incident and goes into hiding as well, learning more and more about V’s motivations and goals. Finally – in one of the larger plot developments retained from the comic – she is forced to choose between giving up her life and protecting his. Meanwhile, the police (led by a suitably bedraggled Stephen Rea) attempt to track V down before he can make good on his promise.




Although the marketing for “V for Vendetta” relies heavily on the fact that this is from “the creators of ‘The Matrix’ trilogy,’ there’s surprisingly little of the expected wire fu and CGI shenanigans that helped make the second and third “Matrix” movies nigh unwatchable. Aside from a handful of fight scenes (only one of which evokes any serious eye-rolling), the Wachowskis actually seem to have given serious effort to telling a story, and not taking three movies to do it.




Of course, this is still a 2-hour adaptation of a wordy, 300-page comic book. Much of the subtlety and ambiguity of Moore’s original work had to be abandoned in favor of unlikely coincidences and plot conveniences. And, as with any Hollywood version of revolution, the film makes the assumption that every oppressed citizen is actively skeptical of their own government, can see through its propaganda, and is eager to take up active resistance. Quaint, but depressingly unrealistic.




Despite the fact that “V for Vendetta” has been bouncing around with different studios for some time, there’s no denying that the finished product was created with the war in Iraq and the ongoing domestic debate concerning wiretaps and shrinking civil liberties in mind. In that respect, it’s one of the first major Hollywood films to take such an overt anti-Bush stance. Certainly there have been a number of documentaries and subdued flicks like “Good Night and Good Luck” casting their stones at the Bush Administration, but the parallels between the Orwellian future onscreen and today’s chilly domestic political climate can’t be denied, and the Wachowskis are far from delicate in their rhetoric.




Finally, when I reviewed the movie “Constantine” (about another Alan Moore creation, humorously enough), I did a version for fans of the comic as well as those seeing the movie cold. This was mostly because I’m a huge fan of that character, and the tactic won’t be repeated here. While I can see the places where the Wachowskis kept Moore’s story and the (many) places where they just ignored it, I think they’ve done as decent a job as can be expected in making the story accessible to a wider audience. With its emphasis on dialogue and political machinations over explosions and kung fu fighting, it remains to be see whether or not “V for Vendetta” will actually find one.


Source:http://www.filmthreat.com/index.php?section=reviews&Id=8807

Silent Hill:Movie Review


***/*****

SILENT HILL
Director: Christophe Gans
Cast: Radha Mitchell, Laurie Holden, Sean Bean, Deborah Kara Unger, Tanya Allen, Jodelle Ferland, Kim Coates, Alice Krige
(TriStar, 2006) Rated: R
Release date: 21 April 20

by Cynthia Fuchs
PopMatters Film and TV Editor

It's Close to Midnight

Rose (Radha Mitchell) loves her little girl more than words can say. And more often than not, she's reduced to base expressions of that affection. Take the start of Silent Hill, where Rose appears in mid-panic, running after Sharon (Jodelle Ferland), a longtime sleepwalker who has wandered off into the night, leading her mom on a wild chase across the highway through a nearby stretch of scary woods, and finally to the edge of a cliff that features an odious waterfall. Rose yells "Sharon!" and "Wait for mommy!" repeatedly as she scurries over this bizarre terrain while dressed in her sleepwear -- short shorts and skimpy undershirt -- bounding in front of oncoming traffic and leaping across ridiculous heights, and reaching the girl just in time to save her from plunging into the thrashing water below.

Phew. Or... maybe not so phew. This opening scene sets up the film's fundamental troubles. Long on atmosphere, it's way short on cunning or beguiling. It's also short on sense, which may be a function of a submerged plot point, that everyone is dead and all that you see here is a series of unattributed hallucinations. Perhaps the simultaneously obscure and derivative plot (screenplay credited to the usually smart Roger Avary) has to do with its basis in a video game. And maybe its lumbering pace and awkward editing -- which hardly match up with director Christophe Gans and editor Sébastien Prangère's previous, strangely elegant collaboration (Brotherhood of the Wolf) -- result from some other, unknown influence (whether studio or otherworldly, the effect is the same).

Following its moody, unfathomable start (why are Rose and her husband Chris [Sean Bean] living near a cliff if they know Sharon sleepwalks? Why are doors unlocked?), Silent Hill offers a briefly incoherent sunshiney-idealy respite: sitting beneath a tree in a lovely open field, Rose tells Sharon they'll be on the road, looking for Silent Hill, the name a town in West Virginia Sharon pronounces during her sleepwalking adventures. Somehow, Rose imagines, going to this place will solve her adopted daughter's trauma. They both close their eyes and maybe they fall asleep, to suggest that what follows is a dream; or they're both already dead from the first scene, and what follows is set in some terrible purgatory.

The drive to Silent Hill is utterly ooky, punctuated by Chris' frantic phone calls to Rose, imploring her not to go -- as he looks up on the town's history on the net and discovers it's actually closed down, owing to an ongoing coal mine fire beneath the ground. (Somehow, Rose missed this tidbit during what you might presume was her own research.) En route, Rose draws the interest of motorcycle cop named Cybil (Laurie Holden), who wears one serious pair of skintight shiny britches and black knee-high boots, not to mention her helmet and large handgun. Cybil seems equipped to deal with whatever comes her way, but of course, she's not, because what does come her way makes no sense. To start, when she tries to pull Rose over on the highway, Rose guns her Jeep and heads off down a dark and windy road marked "Silent Hill," crashing through a large metal fence while instructing her understandably screaming daughter to hang on.

The town itself is as creepy and confused as any of this lead-up intimates (and it's actually full of noise, as opposed to silence), with weather ranging from dreadful downpours to pervasive ash-in-the-air, sometimes night, sometimes day. As Rose has been knocked out by her car crash, and wakes to find Sharon missing from the car, she spends the rest of the film trying to find her daughter, wandering desolate streets and occasionally running into dread-headed Dahlia (Deborah Kara Unger), another mother of a missing daughter. (Again, the waking in this perverse place suggests Rose might not actually be awake, but again, it doesn't much matter.)

While Rose persists in her pursuit of resolution (or something), Chris heads toward Silent Hill as well, where he's stopped by a police inspector, Gucci (Kim Coates), who has found the wife's Jeep and agrees to bring Chris along to search for her. Gucci tells some spastic story about the town's coal fire, the "hellish" day in 1974, when "people were dying and disappearing." (You might think that weirdly poetic and unspecific description, coming from a cop, would worry Chris, but no.) Gucci's dad died that day, but that doesn't quite explain his efforts to keep Chris in the dark. Then gain, "the darkness" is pretty much a character here, literally "coming" at certain times and scaring the occasionally-appearing inhabitants into a church, where they gather to "pray," which means chant and moan and hate on everyone outside.

Sharon also appears intermittently, running through hallways or leading Rose on lengthy chases down dark alleys and into grim basements (at points the music soundtrack turns grindy industrial, at other times bland metal). Conveniently discovering a lighter in her pocket and a series of flashlights that always light up, Rose comes on a number of oddballs, some with miners' gear and a canary in a cage, some seeming boneless or reminiscent of the scary screamer in Aphex Twin's "Come to Daddy," others marching in jaunty-out-of-joint step as if they've emerged from "Thriller" (If only Vincent Price might have provided voiceover explanations). Sometimes their skin flies off like its burning, sometimes they spew bloody-seeming goo. One particular victim-monster has his head tied to his feet, and kind of scoots along the floor as if menacing Rose, who screams bloody murder while standing still and holding her flashlight -- again, miraculously working -- on her ostensible assailant, who actually never quite makes it very far, seeing as he's all tied up and bent.

Even if you decide to go with Silent Hill's not-making-sense premise (which is, really, fine, as the mindscape here is plainly nightmarish and so not bound by physical or emotional logics), the film slips another mickey into its narrative cocktail. And that would be Christabella (Alice Krige, still looking a lot like the Borg Queen), leader of a kind-of cult inhabiting Silent Hill. Self-identified witch-burners, they announce to Rose that she, Sharon, and Dahlia's missing girl are all witches and must be burned in order to maintain their own "purity," whatever that can possibly mean, as they do all resemble ghouls and corpses.

The hordes of folks reciting and grabbing at Rose and Sybil (who shows up to do some ineffective shooting with her big gun) make for a familiar nightmare image, as do Christabella's invectives: "We fight the demon," and "We drew a line in the sand." Barbed wire grows up from a hell-hole below the church floor (it's as if the Big Bad was re-making its appearance in Buffy), a previous victim appears looking burnt, bloody, and gooey, they burn a designated witch (whose skin yuckily melts and falls off). All the while, Rose keeps telling Sharon, "It'll be okay, baby." Er. No.

Eventually Christabella starts to sound a little too familiar, especially as Rose interprets her. Trying to win over the corpsey folks, Rose describes herself as coming from "a world outside," then explains, "This woman uses your fear to control you." This comes very late in the proceedings (which run 127 minutes), when your eyes are well-glazed over, and you might be forgiven for thinking maybe the movie has suddenly turned into a critique of the war on terror. Or maybe not.

source:http://popmatters.com/film/reviews/s/silent-hill-2006.shtml

Wednesday, March 08, 2006

Eight Below:Movie review


***1/2/*****
The screening of Eight Below: Inspired by a True Story was on the morning before a major blizzard was to overtake the Philadelphia area. I was hoping to make it home before the flakes started to fall. I did, but of course the movie, which tells a conventionally wrenching story of eight beloved sled dogs accidentally left to fend for themselves at an Antarctic science base when the inhabitants have to make an emergency evacuation, made me feel vaguely silly. Twelve inches of snow? Thirty degree weather? Really, how horrifying.

I learn from the credits that Eight Below was both "inspired by a true story" and "suggested by" the Japanese film Nankyoku Monogatari, released on video in America as Antarctica. So the true story, whatever it is, is at best at one remove from this Disney affair, which takes as its mission to be as tearjerkingly fanciful as possible. Paul Walker is the human hero, but the dogs are the stars, and the movie spends considerable time alone with them in the Antarctic, where they do things that I doubt any dog would even consider, including some fairly incredible acts of altruism (as the audience coos at the screen in unison). As an aside, the canine actors are also often more expressive than Paul Walker. Just sayin'.

Actually, this is one film that Walker doesn't manage to ruin, though oh how he tries, as does Jason Biggs as his doofus sidekick. It labors hard and for a long time to evoke as few exasperated groans as possible: Walker's Gerry Shepherd, Antarctic guide extraordinaire, seems to have genuine, sweet affection for the animals he works with, and the intrepid scientist whose foolhardiness leads to the rushed abandonment of the base (Bruce Greenwood) seems like a nice, reasonable guy. Whoever is responsible for the hideously stupid trailer, in other words, does not get fruit cup: most of what made me roll my eyes when I watched the advertising and vowed -- vowed! -- not to go see Eight Below is not nearly so offensive in context. Even the immortal line "you gotta take chances for the things you care about," delivered by the ceaselessly dull-eyed Walker at what looked at the time to be some sort of gala or ball, ultimately makes more sense than one might expect. And another clip, the one where Bruce Greenwood wistfully waxes on "these eight amazing dogs," seems to have been excised entirely.

The extended sequences with the dogs alone in the Antarctic wild are at least as impressive as they are silly, the ludicrous title cards helpfully giving us both the date and the number of days the animals have spent on their own notwithstanding. At one point, the dogs have a scary encounter with a leopard seal, and how the scene was filmed remains beyond me -- was it a CGI seal? I honestly do not know. The animal action is flawless, and I could spot no obvious camera or editing tricks to facilitate it. I half-expected to be annoyed, but if anything annoyed me, it was the audience, which invariably interpreted desperate attempts at survival as just adorable. What the hell?

Eight Below becomes cloying in its last act, which also heralds the return of Jason Biggs, an actor with a filmography that can't suggest anything quite this insufferable. There is a series of shameless scenes leading up to the triumphant rescue, and of course the rescue must include the scene where the hero thinks his most cherished friend is dead, but -- wait a minute! -- maybe not. These missteps aside, Eight Below steadfastly resists attempts to pigeonhole it into being merely one of the execrable Disney live action canon. It's a solid adventure film.

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

Something New:Movie Review


***/*****
Kenya (Sanaa Lathan) is an ambitious African American career woman too driven to have a romantic life, yet too tightly wound to remain grounded without one. Landscape architect Brian (Simon Baker) is a blind date who winds up hanging around to reclaim the jungle in the backyard of her new home.

You know how it works. She's a control freak workaholic with demanding standards and an aversion to nature that isn't tamed and trimmed. He's a free and easy green thumb with a spontaneous streak and a romantic sensibility.

And there's one other complication: he's white. In Kenya's cultural circle, dating a white man is something akin to racial betrayal.

Despite the title, "Something New" is nothing new, a familiar tale of lovers separated by cultural assumptions and social expectations. It just feels like it is fresh because it's so rare to see the situation approached from perspective of the black professional community, which director Sanaa Hamri and screenwriter Kriss Turner (both making their feature debuts) explore intelligently -- it's as much about the expectations Kenya has internalized as it is about social pressure -- if not always deftly.

The film comes down to the same question: Will these crazy kids survive the personal clashes and social disapproval? Brian is hardly the ideal pedigree for Kenya's social status -- he's not just white, he's a gardener! -- but if he's the one under scrutiny, she's the one who squirms.

The experiences of a professional African American woman in a predominantly white business culture gives "Something New" an interesting perspective. The warmth of Baker as the cuddly nature boy (another idealized image, certainly, but a romantic one) and the intelligence and fire of Lathan give the lesson, and movie, just enough heart to make it enjoyable.

Schindler's List Movie Review

****1/2/*****
What is called true cinema?Is it special effects,fantasy or mindless actions.No cinema is an art and it depends on director to create magical art of cinema.One such movie which can be called pure cinema and triumph of meaningfull and sensible cinema is Schindler's List

Story:
The true story of Czech born Oskar Schindler, a businessman who tried to make his fortune during the Second World War by exploiting cheap Jewish labour, but ended up penniless having saved over 1000 Polish Jews from almost certain death during the holocaust.

Winner of 7 oscar awards Schindler's List is story of Nazi barbarism.It shows how mean the human beings can be sometimes.Its the most powerfull story ever told about barbarism and brutality.Even the words barbarism and brutality are too less to describe what happened to the jews.Its not only related what happened to the jews but its a slap on face of humanity.How can we call ourselves human beings

The duration of movie is over 3 hours still it never losses its hold.

To call Liam Neeson had given outstanding performance would be an understatement.From a greedy businessman to a humanitarian he is extraordinary.His broke up at the end of the movie is so touching i lost my words to define them.Incredible.I am surprised how he lost the oscar

Ralph Fiennes have given his career best performance.Playing the role of frightening Nazi commandant he just rocks.

And Schindler's List only proves how great a filmmaker is Steven Spielberg.From making movies like (JAWS) to Close Encounters of the Third World to ET to Jurassic Park and recently released Munich and many endless works he is 'God of all Directors'.The way he have shown the brutality and what had happened in past only a great ones like him can do that.

Many of you have seen this movie but i posted review cause i wanted all to know what is called sensible cinema.

With Spielberg's one of the best directed movies and spellbounding performance by Liam Neeson Schindler's List is a must watch for everyone.Especially for them who want to see sensible and meaningfull cinema.

4.5/5
.....A True Classic

Monday, January 16, 2006

Hoodweekend:Movie review


***/*****
Everyone has heard the story of Little Red Riding Hood (Anne Hathaway) – sweet innocent kid with fashion sense, the big bad wolf (Patrick Warburton) - a cross-dressing carnivore, the unsuspecting feeble old granny (Glenn Close), and the mighty woodsman (James Belushi). It’s a classic tale of good vs. evil with good triumphing in the end. Or so we have been led to believe all this time. Detective Nicky Flippers (David Ogden Steirs) doesn’t think this is such an open and shut case and he thinks this “domestic disturbance” may be linked to the “Goody Bandit” who has been stealing recipes for all the sweats and yummies in the forest. He and Chief Grizzly (Xzibit) question all the suspects starting with Red.

It turns out that everyone has a different version of what happened and each account reveals some secrets about the storyteller (some more interesting than others). When all the pieces of the puzzle are revealed, are they any closer to the truth about the Goody Bandit? Or do they need to review the stories to see the common threads?

They have done a marvelous job spinning a fairy tale classic into a modern crime drama with lots of humor. The writing is clever, funny and once you get past the first song it zips along at a pace only cartoons could keep up with. The supporting characters are very entertaining from Twitchy (Cory Edwards) the squirrelly side-kick with way too much energy, to Boingo (Andy Dick) the fuzzy long-eared bunny, Japeth the Goat (Benjy Gaither) who sings instead of speaking, and Woolworth the Sheep (Chazz Palminteri) an informant in sheep’s clothing. Plus you get a gaggle of police creatures, foreign bad guys and woodland inhabitants - they all add humor and visual interest.

This is definitely designed to hold up to multiple kid viewings because there is so much going on that you would notice something different each time. It does have a lot of adult humor that may go over the heads of little children but not so much that it’ll lose their attention.

Last Holiday:movie review


***/*****
If you were given only three weeks to live, would you A) hightail it to Venice and spend the remaining 21 days in the Presidential Suite of Il Palazzo, sipping Chianti and gorging on Linguini Vongole, all while gazing on the majestic Grand Canal, B) throw yourself a pity party and hand out parting gifts to friends and family with the requisite question, "Why me?" written all over them, or C) speed up the inevitable and jump off the nearest bridge? How you answer the aforementioned question will not only reveal whether you're a cynic or an optimist, but how well you'll respond to the new romantic comedy, Last Holiday, starring Queen Latifah.

Like Fun with Dick and Jane, The Producers and Yours, Mine and Ours, Last Holiday is Hollywood's fourth consecutive remake to hit theatres in nearly a month. Based on the 1950 British comedy of the same name, starring the venerated Alec Guinness, Last Holiday reexamines the classic what if theory, only this time with a female character in the lead role.

Georgia Byrd (Queen Latifah) has never been lucky in love, nor in her professional life. In fact, Georgia's one of those rare women who's so sweet and unassuming that every night she dines with a motherless neighbor kid (Jascha Washington, Antwone Fisher), preparing him a multitude of gourmet treats while watching the Emeril Lagasse Show, without even tasting the fruits of her labor. So, when a bump on the head midway through a conversation with a gorgeous appliance salesman named Sean (LL Cool J) leads to the grim diagnosis of a potentially life-threatening brain tumor, Georgia's life seems like it could be over even before it's begun.

Of course, when Georgia's health insurance won't cover the operation to remove her brain tumor, and her vile boss ignores her as she tries to tell him she's dying, Georgia decides to cut her losses and cashes in her savings for the vacation of a lifetime. Arriving in style via helicopter to the posh Grand Hotel Pupp in Karlovy Vary, a picturesque resort in the Czech Republic, Georgia immediately strikes up a friendship with the gregarious staff, including an acclaimed French chef named Didier (Gérard Depardieu), who takes a liking to the New Orleans native when she orders an entire night's worth of specials just for dinner. But all this adoration doesn't sit well with Matthew Kragen (Timothy Hutton), a wealthy retail magnate, who thinks Georgia's nothing more than a corporate spy posing as a fun loving socialite, in order to expose an unauthorized business deal for a new group of Kragen department stores.

Although the film's premise leaves much to the imagination, in order for a romantic comedy like Last Holiday to truly succeed the following criteria is expressly required: a witty script filled with humor, insight and poignancy, a talented cast well versed at juggling comedy and drama, and an experienced director who's shrewd enough to trust his instincts without going overboard and draining the life out of an otherwise good-humored film. Despite the fact that Last Holiday never quite fulfills the aforementioned list, milking laughs from nearly half a dozen one-liners that are neither fresh nor snappy, its heart remains in the right place, even when it fails to generate little more than sympathetic giggles from its target audience.

Fans of the original Last Holiday will likely be disappointed by the way in which screenwriters Jeffrey Price and Peter S. Seaman (Dr. Seuss' How the Grinch Stole Christmas) have taken J.B. Priestley's clever script and turned it into a modern-day fairytale, complete with a designer makeover montage and cameo appearances by Emeril Lagasse and Smokey Robinson. Of course, anytime Hollywood remakes a film that is considered a classic, there are always those skeptics who are so hell-bent on labeling it a fraud that they spend the entire movie comparing it to the original without even appreciating what it gets right. The whole point of a movie like Last Holiday is to inspire viewers to lighten up, seize the moment and embrace life's monumental ups and downs with courage, grace and an unwavering sense of humor. And that's exactly what Last Holiday does, thanks to director Wayne Wang (Maid in Manhattan), who keeps the film moving without it becoming too sentimental.

Still, much of the film's heart comes from its stellar international cast, who infuse Last Holiday with a palpable sense of joy. In one of his last performances before retiring (Please say it ain't so), French superstar Gérard Depardieu proves once again why there's no role he can't conquer, elevating his character from a haughty, temperamental chef to someone the audience can actually relate to. While Ranjit Chowdhry (Mississippi Masala) scores big laughs, delivering a memorable performance as Georgia's high-strung neurologist. As for Last Holiday's star, Queen Latifah, not only does she up the film's status from genre fluff to heartwarming romantic comedy with merely the power of her presence, but she creates such a fun, irresistible character that viewers are happy to follow her even on a slightly turbulent Last Holiday.

The chronicles of Narnia:Movie review


****/*****

Wow, this has got to be one of the longest damned titles ever for a movie. It’s good that they’re pushing the Narnia part as it’d never succeed with people trying to remember the title of it, that’s for sure. Welcome to the Next Big Franchise, well, so the studio hopes. I have my doubts though, to be honest. I think this is a great film, I think it’s an amazing book series, but I can’t see the fervor for this series that kid’s have for the Harry Potter films and books. Which will be a shame as this is a great series, but, if nothing else, maybe some new people will get into reading the entire series from this film. As adaptations go, you can’t get much closer than this does, which is a blessing, but can also be a curse.

It’s World War II and the Nazis have targeted London. The city isn’t safe and so the children are shipped out to the country for safety’s sake while the parents remain and watch the skies. Four young children are sent off by their mother to stay with a reclusive professor and his housekeeper far away from the falling bombs, though to the children, this is far worse than the world they are leaving. The mansion they arrive at is enormous, and full of wonderful places for children to hide, and the grounds are expansive and waiting for adventure but as soon as they arrive they are given a very strict list of guidelines to follow, setting the tone for their stay and sending them a clear message – they are not wanted there. The children make do as best they can and, upon the first rainy day, manage to find good use for the great house they find themselves within – a rousing game of hide and go seek. Three of the children take their places as the eldest boy counts. When she can’t find a hiding place of her own, the youngest, Lucy, finds an open room that is empty save for a large wardrobe full of the professor’s fur coats. She slips into the room to hide and, while moving to the back of the wardrobe finds that there is no back, that in fact it leads to a veritable winter wonderland. Shocked and excited she explores a bit and comes upon a strange man with cloven hoofs who calls himself Tumnus and who invites her to tea. Alas, tea is not the only thing on the mind of Mr. Tumnus as a decree has been issued by the self-appointed queen of Narnia that any humans that find themselves in the lands must be brought before her majesty, and those who do not abide by this command will suffer her wrath. Tumnus cannot bring himself to turn in his innocent new friend so he smuggles her out of Narnia before she is seen. When the girl returns to her own world and tells her siblings where she’s been no one believes her, much to her dismay, but it won’t be long until they more than believe, but find themselves in this very dangerous world. Narnia is a world perched on the edge of war, the tyranny of the queen, known by many as the White Witch, has doomed the world to ice but the real king, a great lion named Aslan, is prepared to return, but needs the assistance of four human children to do it. So these four children, who have been sheltered from the war by their mother, must now actively take part in the greatest battle another world has ever seen in order to redeem a sin one of them has committed there, and to restore peace and happiness to this world. But battle has its costs, and they have yet to fully understand that, but shall soon enough.

It’s a shame that so many big Hollywood movies are forced into the same release dates during the year as this is a film that really deserves an audience. It’s a terrific fantasy and is a good film for children. Sadly it has to battle Harry Potter and a big ape and it’s not going to be a great thing for any of the three films. This is a very fine film though. The special effects, save for some awkward blue screens in the background once in a while, are great. The children are fine actors. They got a fantastic voice for Aslan in Liam Neeson. I love the way the filmmakers mimic the film’s opening, the bombing of London by the Nazis, during the beginning of the great war at the end of the film. This is about as true and fine an adaptation as you can ask for. I loved that they let the movie be what it is. Yes, it’s a religious film, and book, if you are looking, but these are not things that get in the way of, or become a focal point for the film. So if you are looking for it, it’s there, if not, then you miss nothing.

Though being a perfectly true adaptation can be a problem in and of itself. The thing that made Lord of the Rings so great was that they fleshed the books out in the adaptation. They added a lot more depth to the characters. The same needed to be done here. There is so much going on that C.S. Lewis didn’t take a lot of time to really flesh the characters out, at least not to me. They were outlines with shading. The film does the same thing. You meet a lot of great characters but none of them, save for Tumnus and the children, do you feel really connected to, which harms the film during the battle when characters are falling to their deaths and you can’t really get too upset for them as you don’t know them as more than a face. The power of the Harry Potter films is that you really know these kids through the films and so you care about them. You don’t quite get that in Narnia. Some have been put off by the appearance of a character in the film, who I won’t name, but this is a classic character in literature and yes, he’s in the book, check it out.

The thing we forget these days is how generally bad fantasy films were in the past. Not all, no, no, but a lot of them were very bad. And while we were spoiled by the LOTR films, there are some damned good fantasy films being made these days, as well as some very good book adaptations being done. I hope that this will become a film that finds a second life on DVD and on the television so people can get a better feel for how good this film is. I wouldn’t say it’s an instant classic, but it’s a solid film that some day may well be seen as a near miss classic.

Glory Road:Movie Review


***1/2/*****
Glory Road has its share of clichés and is fairly one dimensional character-wise, but nonetheless surprises as an absorbing film. It’s the story of how the 1966 Texas Western Miners won the NCAA Basketball Championship with an all-black team. Led by an upstart coach, Don Haskins (Josh Lucas), the team faced extreme intolerance throughout their championship run. Derek Luke co-stars as star point guard and team leader Bobby Joe Hill. Glory Road does an excellent job recreating the racial injustice of that era. Similar films have addressed this issue, but failed to illustrate what those times were really like for black athletes. This film delivers the message and is entertaining to boot. It has some of the best editing I’ve ever seen in a sports film. Director James Gartner really captures the frenetic pace and excitement of the games.

The chemistry between the lead actors is also very good. While the film focuses primarily on racial themes, the players are seen facing these obstacles together. It reinforces their bonds and contributes to their success on the court. The white players on the team do get some screen time. And the film does not gloss over the antagonism between the different races as they come together. What it could have done better was define these characters. After a while, the white players become just faces in the crowd. They are seen, but heard and are given nothing to do. While Glory Road is primarily the story of the black players, it would have been more interesting to have the white characters explored as well.

Racism is front and center in the film. Director James Gartner does not shy away from the bigotry the team faced. It’s in this sense that Glory Road really succeeds. It depicts a time that most people have no concept of. Racial slurs are constantly hurled at the players, along with food, fists, and death threats. Those were ugly times and the film dramatically captures it.

The pace of the film drags at points, but pick up with the excellent shooting of the basketball games. Ever game gets progressively better and incorporates a myriad of camera angles. Gartner and his editing team do a great job here. They get creative with their shot choices and it adds real style to the film.

Glory Road is not on par with the great sports films, but is a worthwhile attempt to match them. It has the right ingredients but comes up a little short. That said, it’s definitely worth seeing and is easily the best choice of new releases this weekend.

Brokeback Mountain :Movie Review


***1/2/*****

Ennis tells Jack about something he saw as a boy. "There were two old guys shacked up together. They were the joke of the town, even though they were pretty tough old birds." One day they were found beaten to death. Ennis says: "My dad, he made sure me and my brother saw it. For all I know, he did it."

This childhood memory is always there, the ghost in the room, in Ang Lee's "Brokeback Mountain." When he was taught by his father to hate homosexuals, Ennis was taught to hate his own feelings. Years after he first makes love with Jack on a Wyoming mountainside, after his marriage has failed, after his world has compressed to a mobile home, the laundromat, the TV, he still feels the same pain: "Why don't you let me be? It's because of you, Jack, that I'm like this -- nothing, and nobody."

But it's not because of Jack. It's because Ennis and Jack love each other and can find no way to deal with that. "Brokeback Mountain" has been described as "a gay cowboy movie," which is a cruel simplification. It is the story of a time and place where two men are forced to deny the only great passion either one will ever feel. Their tragedy is universal. It could be about two women, or lovers from different religious or ethnic groups -- any "forbidden" love.

The movie wisely never steps back to look at the larger picture, or deliver the "message." It is specifically the story of these men, this love. It stays in closeup. That's how Jack and Ennis see it. "You know I ain't queer," Ennis tells Jack after their first night together. "Me, neither," says Jack.

Their story begins in Wyoming in 1963, when Ennis (Heath Ledger) and Jack (Jake Gyllenhaal) are about 19 years old and get a job tending sheep on a mountainside. Ennis is a boy of so few words he can barely open his mouth to release them; he learned to be guarded and fearful long before he knew what he feared. Jack, who has done some rodeo riding, is a little more outgoing. After some days have passed on the mountain and some whiskey has been drunk, they suddenly and almost violently have sex.

"This is a one-shot thing we got going on here," Ennis says the next day. Jack agrees. But it's not. When the summer is over, they part laconically: “I guess I’ll see ya around, huh?”Their boss (Randy Quaid) tells Jack he doesn't want him back next summer: "You guys sure found a way to make the time pass up there. You weren't getting paid to let the dogs guard the sheep while you stemmed the rose."

Some years pass. Both men get married. Then Jack goes to visit Ennis in Wyoming, and the undiminished urgency of their passion stuns them. Their lives settle down into a routine, punctuated less often than Jack would like by "fishing trips." Ennis' wife, who has seen them kissing, says nothing about it for a long time. But she notices there are never any fish.

The movie is based on a short story by E. Annie Proulx. The screenplay is by Larry McMurtry and Diana Ossana. This summer I read McMurtry's Lonesome Dove trilogy, and as I saw the movie I was reminded of Gus and Woodrow, the two cowboys who spend a lifetime together. They aren't gay; one of them is a womanizer and the other spends his whole life regretting the loss of the one woman he loved. They're straight, but just as crippled by a society that tells them how a man must behave and what he must feel.

"Brokeback Mountain" could tell its story and not necessarily be a great movie. It could be a melodrama. It could be a "gay cowboy movie." But the filmmakers have focused so intently and with such feeling on Jack and Ennis that the movie is as observant as work by Bergman. Strange but true: The more specific a film is, the more universal, because the more it understands individual characters, the more it applies to everyone. I can imagine someone weeping at this film, identifying with it, because he always wanted to stay in the Marines, or be an artist or a cabinetmaker.

Jack is able to accept a little more willingly that he is inescapably gay. In frustration and need, he goes to Mexico one night and finds a male prostitute. Prostitution is a calling with many hazards, sadness and tragedy, but it accepts human nature. It knows what some people need, and perhaps that is why every society has found a way to accommodate it. Jack thinks he and Ennis might someday buy themselves a ranch and settle down. Ennis who remembers what he saw as a boy: "This thing gets hold of us at the wrong time and wrong place and we're dead." Well, wasn't Matthew Shepard murdered in Wyoming in 1998? And Teena Brandon in Nebraska in 1993? Haven't brothers killed their sisters in the Muslim world to defend "family honor"?

There are gentle and nuanced portraits of Ennis' wife Alma (Michelle Williams) and Jack's wife Lureen (Anne Hathaway), who are important characters, seen as victims, too. Williams has a powerful scene where she finally calls Ennis on his "fishing trips," but she takes a long time to do that, because nothing in her background prepares her for what she has found out about her husband. In their own way, programs like "Jerry Springer" provide a service by focusing on people, however pathetic, who are prepared to defend what they feel. In 1963 there was nothing like that on TV. And in 2005, the situation has not entirely changed. One of the Oscar campaign ads for "Brokeback Mountain" shows Ledger and Williams together, although the movie's posters are certainly honest.

Ang Lee is a director whose films are set in many nations and many times. What they have in common is an instinctive sympathy for the characters. Born in Taiwan, he makes movies about Americans, British, Chinese, straights, gays; his sci-fi movie "Hulk" was about a misunderstood outsider. Here Lee respects the entire arc of his story, right down to the lonely conclusion.

A closing scene involving a visit by Ennis to Jack's parents is heartbreaking in what is said, and not said, about their world. A look around Jack's childhood bedroom suggests what he overcame to make room for his feelings. What we cannot be sure is this: In the flashback, are we witnessing what really happened, or how Ennis sees it in his imagination? Ennis, whose father "made sure me and my brother saw it."